Weld identification and classification

Introduction

Welding is the only pipeline fabrication process which occurs in the field. Due to the lack of consistency, welds are the most common locations for failures in a pipeline. Even a perfectly executed welding process introduces material heterogeneity, particularly in the heat-affected zone (HAZ) adjacent to the weld. This zone experiences significant thermal and mechanical changes, including grain coarsening, phase transformations, and residual stresses. The HAZ is also particularly susceptible to stress-induced cracking and corrosion.

Additionally, weld defects such as porosity, incomplete fusion, and slag inclusions act as stress concentrators, further increasing the risk of failure at these locations in the pipeline. Detecting these defects is a key objective of pipeline integrity management. While traditional magnetic flux leakage (MFL) devices have made significant strides in the area of weld inspection, they face limitations in handling pipelines with complex geometries.

Remnant magnetometry offers an alternative approach by analyzing the residual magnetic signatures left by welding and other stress-inducing processes. These signatures provide valuable insights into the structural integrity of pipeline welds, enabling the identification of potential defects.

Weld identification

Weld morphology, as detected by residual magnetometry, is highly varied. Some pipeline welds can be found with a simple peak search, while others appear as subtle increases in oscillation frequency. Others are so subtle that they can only be determined by considering the average weld spacing in the surrounding area.
Weld indentification and classification Neural network - Weld identification and classification

As weld identification lacks precise articulatable attributes which might lend it to imperative programming, a neural network is the most promising solution.

INGU Weld Net – the INGU Weld identification neural network – is an implementation of U-Net, a widely used deep learning architecture that was first introduced in the “U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation” paper . We used a training set of 110,000 samples to train the INGU Weld Net which resulted in 95% automated weld recognition. A task that would typically take days is now performed in less than 1 hour.

The results of this work were first presented at the 2023 Pipeline Technology Conference in Berlin, see our paper Pipeline joint identification using neural networks.

Weld classification

The magnetic signatures of welds in a given pipeline will have some generic weld properties and some pipeline specific properties. Using principal component analysis (PCA) – a statistical method that transforms high-dimensional data into a lower-dimensional space while preserving as much variance as possible –welds in a pipeline can be classified and anomalous welds in the pipeline can be identified.

The essence of the method is that several core shapes (eigenwelds) in a weld are identified and for every weld in a pipeline it is determined which linear combination of these eigenwelds describes the weld best. Consequently, welds that cannot be described with the most dominant eigenwelds are anomalous and worth investigating.

More details about this method can be found in our paper Anomalous Weld Identification by Applying Principal Component Analysis to Magnetic Flux Density Data Captured by a Free-Floating ILI Tool.

Client case study

One of our client’s oil fields had a very old pipeline infrastructure consisting of two- and three-inch pipelines. When the infrastructure was created, none of the conventional inline inspection tools we are familiar with today had the ability to inspect these small pipelines, and therefore our client’s pipelines had never been inspected. When our client had a failure with a pipeline in the area, they started looking for a solution to proactively inspect the pipelines in this field. The client chose to use Pipers® as their pipeline condition assessment solution.

Pipers® inspection results

A typical weld signal is a narrow peak in the magnetic flux density data as highlighted green in below figure. The area highlighted in red was also identified as a weld, but the structure contains multiple peaks and is broader, so it was reported as an anomalous weld. The client did a verification dig and found the weld as shown in the picture below which is a clear case of incomplete penetration.
Weld identification and classification - Weld identification and classification
Case study Weld identification and classification 1 - Weld identification and classification

Pipers® Magnetic Flux Density data.

Cut out of a weld. Left side: inside of the pipeline. Right side: outside of the pipeline.

Stay in the loop